Radnice Roman Catholic parish registers (SOA Plzeň, Porta fontium), RO31 marriages

Transcription (as written): 28 Oct 1901 church marriage: Anežka Taubrová (b. Moštice house 27; father Jan Taubr miner Moštice 27; mother Anna née Králová Moštice 7) × František Vlček (miner, Svinná 23, born Kamenec).

2026-10-27 (karel): Annie 27 Oct POSITIVE. Ancestry: Anežka 212806421666 already child of Jan 212735815392 × Anna 212735815432; František Vlček 212811640965 CREATED; Marriage 28 Oct 1901 Radnice ON with Porta cite + gallery jpg + Research Note (NEEDS REVIEW crop; Gross WEAK). Family event — spouse required. Kamenec birthplace left unset on František (ambiguous autocomplete).

Validator (claude-opus-5-5, 2026-10-28): supports, confidence 4/4, tier record.
The second entry on the page records the marriage on 28 October 1901 of František Vlček, miner of Svinná 23 and born in Kamenec, and Anežka Taubrová of Moštice 27. The bride's parents are given as Jan Taubr, miner of Moštice 27, and Anna née Králová of Moštice 7. Her birth date of 13 January 1881 in the age column matches the claimed 1881. The names, date, residences and parents all agree with the claim and the transcription. Radnice as the place comes from the source citation rather than from the visible page.
Matches: Second entry on the page (fol. 238): year 1901, month října (October), day 28; Groom: Vlček František, horník (miner) at Svinná č. 23, born in Kamenec, son of Catholic parents Hynek Vlček, cottager at Svinná 23, and Františka née Mašínová of Kamenec; Bride: Taubrová Anežka, born in Moštice, residence Moštice č. 27; Bride's parents: Jan Taubr, miner of Moštice 27, and Anna née Králová of Moštice 7; Bride's birth date in the age column reads 13/1 1881, matching the claimed birth year 1881; Officiant Václav Dvořák, farář; the right page notes the father's consent to the marriage, signed by Jan Taubr (otec)
Limits: The parish name is not visible in the cropped page. Radnice as the place rests on the source citation (Radnice RO31), not on wording in the entry.; The entry does not name the specific church building. Moštice and Svinná appear to belong to this parish.; The citation calls the section 'Mostiště' while the record reads Moštice. This looks like a labelling variant, not a conflict.; The record cannot settle the later US identity question mentioned in the claim note.