Radnice Roman Catholic parish registers (SOA Plzeň, Porta fontium), RO19 births

Transcription (as written): RO19 fol. 154, row 5, Mostiště: František, male, legitimate, born 1 Feb 1865, baptized 2 Feb 1865, Mostiště house 27. Father Taubr Jan, havíř [miner] v Mosticích č.d. 26, son of † Tomáš Taubr (havíř, Mostiště 10) and Lidmila née Ocásková (Mostiště 6); mother Králová Barbora, daughter of Jan Král, rolník, Mostiště 7, and Marie née Čermáková (Dvorec 246). Priest P. Ant. Farka, kaplan; midwife Barbora Opatrná, zkoumaná z Lohovic. Margin: † 18/4 [18]67. Godparents (Kurrent) LOW CONFIDENCE / unlocked, not transcribed.

2026-10-28 (karel): Parish STEP 5: second child of Jan Tauber 212735815392 × Barbora Králová 212806421374. Birth fact ON Ancestry.
Conflicts: ["Child house 27 vs father's line house 26."]

Validator (claude-opus-5-5, 2026-10-28): supports, confidence 3/4, tier record.
The visible entry gives František, born 1 and baptized 2 February 1865, at Moštice house no. 27 (Liblín dominion, Rokycany district). The priest is P. Ant. Farka, kaplan, and the midwife is Barbora Opatrná of Lohovice. A margin note gives a death of 18/4 1867, consistent with the 1865–1867 lifespan. The crop cuts off the parents' columns, so the Tauber surname and the noted house 26 vs 27 difference (the father's residence, not the claimed birthplace) can only be verified on the full page.
Matches: Child's name František matches the claim; Year 1865, month února (February), born 'dne 1', baptized 'dne 2' match the claimed birth 1 Feb 1865 and baptism 2 Feb 1865; House 'č. d. 27' matches the claimed House 27; Place written 'Moštice', Liblínské panství, Rokycanský, Plzenský; read here as the same village as the claim's Mostiště; Priest 'P. Ant. Farka, kaplan' matches the claim; Midwife 'Barbora Opatrná, zkoumaná z Lohovic' matches the claim; Margin note '† 18/4 [18]67' fits the claimed lifespan 1865–1867
Limits: The cropped image does not show the father/mother columns, so the surname Taubr/Tauber and the parents rest on the transcription only; The father's residence at house 26 (vs the child's birth at house 27) comes from the transcription and cannot be checked in this crop; The fol. 154 / row 5 position cannot be confirmed from the crop; The image shows the record's own jurisdiction (Liblín dominion, Rokycany and Plzeň districts), not 'Radnice'; Radnice is the parish of the register